In the realm of royal traditions, the recent alteration in Prince Louis’s official name has stirred both curiosity and controversy. Let’s delve into the intricacies of this development, starting with a historical perspective.
Prince Louis, the youngest offspring of Kate Middleton and Prince William, was initially named Louis Arthur Charles upon his birth in 2018. However, a surprising turn of events unfolded when Queen Elizabeth II decided to amend a century-old royal rule to ensure that he held a distinguished title.
Historical Context: King George V’s Rule
To comprehend this royal decree, we must harken back to 1917 when King George V established a rule stipulating that only the children of the sovereign would be bestowed with the titles of Prince or Princess at birth. This also extended to grandchildren born through the male line.
Queen’s Intervention for Prince and Princess of Wales
Bucking this historical trend, the Queen intervened when the Prince and Princess of Wales became parents. She orchestrated a change in the rule to guarantee that all their offspring would receive their HRH titles, a move that marked a departure from tradition.
Exemption for Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s Children
Interestingly, this rule alteration did not extend to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s children, showcasing a nuanced approach within the royal family.
Royal Surnames and Louis’s Unique Case
Members of the royal family are not typically referred to by a surname. However, Louis and his siblings, Prince George and Princess Charlotte, use their father’s title as a surname at school, setting them apart in this royal tradition.
The Significance of the Name Louis
The name Louis carries a deep significance, paying homage to Lord Louis Mountbatten, who was an uncle to Prince Philip and a mentor to King Charles. His tragic death in an IRA bombing in 1979 adds a layer of poignancy to this choice of name.
Historical Roots of the Name Arthur
Additionally, the inclusion of the name Arthur reflects regal traditions, harkening back centuries. Notably, King Henry VIII’s first son, also named Arthur, met an untimely demise as a teenager.
The article also sheds light on the controversy surrounding Meghan and Harry’s decision to name their daughter Lilibet, a name that holds immense sentimental value within the royal family.
Queen’s Alleged Displeasure
Reports suggest that Queen Elizabeth was displeased with this decision, expressing frustration over the use of her personal nickname, “Lilibet.”
Meghan and Harry’s Response
Contradictory reports emerge regarding whether Meghan and Harry sought permission from the Queen to use the name Lilibet. An insider vehemently denies any breach of protocol, asserting that proper permission was obtained.
Author’s Perspective: Robert Hardman
Insights from Robert Hardman, the author of “Charles III: New King. New Court. The Inside Story,” provide a unique perspective on the dynamics within the royal family.
Queen’s Desire for Prince Harry’s Return
In a surprising revelation, the article unveils the Queen’s purported desire to have Prince Harry back in the family, albeit not in a working capacity.
Contradictions in Reports
As with any sensational news, conflicting narratives and statements emerge, adding layers of complexity to the narrative.
Public sentiment becomes a crucial element in the unfolding drama, as the news of royal decisions continues to captivate audiences worldwide.
In conclusion, the saga of Prince Louis’s name change, intertwined with the Lilibet controversy, paints a vivid picture of the intricate web of traditions, sentiments, and familial dynamics within the royal household.